Hearsay vs. proof
Eduardo Pontaoe
16 Jan 2010
Re: Registrar’s office mumbo-jumbo
Mr. Alexander Ynzon:
Hold it there, Mr. Ynzon!
Well, it’s uncalled for on your part to accuse the Assistant Registrar of Pangasinan of corruption – in accepting bribes to facilitate papers of ownership.
It’s not what you know . . . it’s what you can prove.
Can you prove Mr. Ynzon, this registrar’s hands were greased with two hundred (P200,000.00) thousand pesos to transfer the Deed of Title from your parents to your brother?
What you heard is pure hearsay!
You’re shooting in the dark with blanks.
This how it goes, the mechanics of real estate. The transfer was legit based on the Deed of Donation made to your brother.
Note: It’s not a Deed Of Absolute Sale to avoid capital gains tax.
The registrar was just following the dictates of the law, whether the signatures on the instrument were faked or not.
It’s not the registrar’s domain to check on the veracity of the signatures . . . on the reason . . . it was witnessed, notarized, and duly recorded.
It’s your call to dispute your brother before a court of law.
But, don’t you dare accusing a provincial official of misconduct when you have no hands to grab and legs to stand on.
It would be shameful to act in an illogical way.
Share your Comments or Reactions
Powered by Facebook Comments
