Ed Pontaoe
19 Mar 2008

 

 

Eventually, as to mountebanks, Mr. Oriel admitted truthfully, that all he’s blabbering about in this Forum is lacking in strength and utterly deceptive.

Wishy-washy!

In his post on the 15th he tried to pass the blame on Rev. Dieleman telling me to rebuke this pastor – not him – on the sermon Mr. Oriel copied in his defense on meekness vis-à-vis George Washington.

If so, how come Mr. Oriel had the gall to reason out Dieleman’s sermon he knew he couldn’t provide?

Now, he’s claiming no knowledge about Dieleman – who this man is – but he used him as a shield to protect himself.

He said, “I am not interested on the messenger anyway. I am interested on the message”.

He’s only, but only interested in the message, in spite of the possibility the messenger is the Devil himself.

What we despise, abhor most and outright disappointment in this Forum, is for a person who has the forked tongue – a practitioner of the double talk. A snake oil salesman.

He who seems to share his unselfish knowledge in the Bible and a broad spectrum of discourse but in reality indulges in chicanery. The portrayal of such deep knowledge is all but a . . . sham.

Have a nice day! Do you really know what it means, Mr. Oriel?