Jose Ceralde
19 Sept 2007

 

 

Engineering may not be the first solution to the flooding of our beloved city.

I hope the first questioned asked are the ones that would not involved major expenditure. Could a change of doing things alleviate the problem? Will the mining activities from the highlands, or lumber industry be able to help and had they been consulted? How about the fish pen operators from blocking the waterways? Lastly how about the people who indiscriminately throw trash in the drainage?

I know I did not ask all the questions here but this brainstorming should have happen. I work in the aviation industry and I am required to look for policy change or operational change before I could look for engineering design changes which always cost a lot more money and time.

 It is easier to change operational manuals by shutting a few engines during taxi operation in saving fuel than to change the million dollar engine.

It is easier to train people not to throw residual fuel on the ramp than to build catchments and sample areas.

But then, without big dreams or big projects, the commissions will not be able to attract or “gulat” people. The chain will not be fed and it may break.

Share your Comments or Reactions

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments