Rebellion vs. murder
Jose Ceralde
6 Dec 2009
Re: Is China right?
JDV must be on track then when he proposed a union with China and create a common market, legal, and financial treaty. With an EU type of government, GMA or China could send those who were behind the massacre of victims to the firing squad. China in a short time, less than a year, just executed the profiteers of the tainted milk that killed some babies that were feed with the milk. But then China could not even feed their population with famine a common occurrence in life. Yet it could posture to the world it’s big Olympic style projects and huge dollar coffers. So if we join them in treaties, then we are joined with their famine problems.
So much for what could be done with massacre killers. Because even in China the killers have to be charged with a crime first.
Senator Biazon’s press release was very disturbing. He said filing of “rebellion” is wrong because it should be “mass murder” charges. His reasons, in rebellion killings for a cause is different and this may wiggle them out of their accountability for the killings. In mass murder, they will be accountable for the killings, he said.
So the dampening of outrage against the massacre had begun and gimmicks will be the rule. GMA has lots of brilliant people who are very experienced in this for eight long years.
Mass murder to the World Court is the answer!! Otherwise a pardon is coming, right GMA?
Share your Comments or Reactions
Powered by Facebook Comments
