A Legacy Act
By Farah G. Decano
THE Philippines’ long-standing struggle with flooding raises a critical question: are our flood control projects truly effective, or are they merely haphazard, politically-motivated undertakings?
Many current projects seem to be chosen from a standard menu of schemes, implemented without a comprehensive, science-backed plan. This reactive – “devil may care” approach – often leads to ineffective, isolated structures that fail to provide long-term solutions. It’s about time to demand a more strategic and enduring solution—a Legacy Act for flood mitigation.
A google search of national laws and proposed bills regarding flood mitigation yields something in common – the creation of a central office that is focused solely on flood prevention and mitigation.
Instead of simply creating new offices or networks, we need a robust, data-driven system that is specifically tailored to our country’s unique geographical and environmental challenges.
Local officials should lead the development of a comprehensive flood control master plan in their respective local government units. This plan should be based on scientific studies and developed through extensive public consultations to ensure that it is not only effective but that it also has the full support of the community.
A comprehensive plan should:
(1) Outline the entire strategy, from its initial consultation phase to full implementation;
(2) Prioritize projects based on urgency and potential impact; and
(3) Detail a clear timeline for the completion of each phase and the entire program.
By embedding this plan into a local ordinance, we can ensure its continuity regardless of changes in political leadership.
To guarantee accountability, a citizen-led watch group, selected by the residents themselves, should be empowered to monitor its implementation. This process is more than just a legislative exercise because it gives the community a sense of ownership which transforms residents from passive beneficiaries into active stakeholders.
* * * *
It’s a common sight during times of disaster: politicians appearing for photo opportunities during the distribution of aid. While their presence may be motivated by a desire to be seen as helpful, a more significant contribution would be to dedicate that same energy to legislative duties that create lasting solutions.
We see on the news how most politicians rush to assist in flood relief operations, yet they do not see the urgency to investigate the effectiveness of existing flood control projects. This lack of oversight and accountability is a disservice to the public.
The allegations made by former Vice Mayor Alvin Fernandez on social media deserve a formal inquiry. Ano ang masama kung magtanong ang ating mga elected officials sa DPWH para maliwanagan ang taumbayan?
* * * *
Vigilance is not opposition. When citizens become watchful and actively monitor infrastructure projects, they are often labeled as “oppositionists” by some.
However, exercising vigilance is not an act of political defiance; it is actually a fundamental aspect of civic duty. It is about holding public officials and contractors accountable to ensure that projects are completed correctly and on time.
As private citizens, we should be empowered to ask questions and demand transparency. Mayors and other officials should not view this as a threat but as a partnership.
Public vigilance will help to ensure that contractors adhere to the terms of their contracts, ultimately saving public funds and improving the quality of life for everyone. This kind of civic engagement is a sign of a healthy and functioning democracy, not a sign of political enmity.
Instead of engaging in petty political rivalries, we should start to work together to create a legacy of vigilant and satisfied communities. After all, our collective goal should be to ensure that no one has to endure the devastation of flooding year after year after year.
Share your Comments or Reactions
Powered by Facebook Comments
